Showing posts with label mini multi movies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mini multi movies. Show all posts

Monday, February 24, 2025

Better a Broken (Poster) Promise Than None at All

Mark Twain said that. 

The thing about promises. Well, minus the (poster) part.

Supposedly he was commenting on the idea that even if a promise gets broken, having at least made it in the first place shows some amount of good intention. I don't know if that's always the case in real life, but it's a nice sentiment. 

Now you might be asking why this particular quote is bumping around in the ol' (deadmans) brain today. And if you are, the answer would be 'cause I've been scrolling through the ol' deadmans Letterboxd watched list, and reflecting on a few films I've seen where Poster Promises either were or were Not Fulfilled (PPF or PPNF). 

And of course I didn't just fall off the turnip truck. In fact, I'm a long time passenger on the advertising-exists-to-sell-things-not-to-tell-the-truth-about-them truck. I've been buying questionable things out of the back of that truck for many a year, truth be told. So I get it: you promise what you need to in order to make the sale. 

Still. Some take this philosophy further than others. I mean, there's breaking a promise and then there's shattering a promise into tiny sharp shards that cut you until blood makes a heart shaped stain on your soul.

That went a little dark.

Really I just thought I'd throw out a few vintage creature features where a poster promised more, creature-wise, than a film actually delivered. Or maybe some did deliver. I guess we'll see. 

As I go I'll say a word or two about each, whatever springs to mind. Unless nothing springs, which sometimes happens. Fair warning.

So here we go. In alphabetical order, cause that's how I'm rolling today.


A*P*E (1976) 

 

The Promise

not to be confused

Let's see... we got giant shark defied... 

(sorry to insert but every time i read "giant shark defied" my brain changes it to "giant shark defiled" and i don't like the image that brings up for me in my head. no, i do not like it at all. end of insert.)

city destroyed... ocean liner demolished... giant "monster reptile" snake vanquished... apparently all at the same time. Fury of the ten-ton variety. Screen-leaping (and to be fair the film was actually shot in 3D). 

Whew! So much going on here! I'm excited to see this epic story play out...

The Reality

(PPNF)

i am a giant ape
this is not a toy cow

Um... smallish man... ill-fitting ape suit... someone's back lawn... tiny plastic cow. 

Of course, technically the movie did have shark battling-city destroying-ship sinking-snake vanquishing stuff in it, but it was all plastic cow-level shark battling-city destroying-ship sinking-snake vanquishing stuff. Definitely not as promised.

Anyway, I recall my first viewing of this film. That Not Kong Not Jaws Grudge Match was pretty much the first scene of the movie and not only was it was over QUICK, I remember thinking "that little shark the actor is throwing around is dead. They killed a baby shark for this thing." I don't know if that's true but it looked dead.

Hmm... wait. You know, now that I think about it, my very VERY first, pre-poster, eyes-on artwork for this film was more likely the amazing cover Bob Larkin did for Famous Monsters of Filmland #146 below. Check it out:

pretty sure in this version of things the ape was eaten by the shark
swimmer was dessert
 

What an eyeball-feast this cover is! Shark is definitely front and center here. And our poor cover-ape (heroic, unlike his movie-ape twin) is trying so hard to keep his human-lady-love (who never even meets the shark in-film) from being chomped down upon. Doesn't look like he's doing too good a job of things though. Great painting nonetheless. Even if it, too, does not fulfill promises.

Moving on to the next movie... and please be patient as I prep it - no need to get crabby.

 

Attack of the Crab Monsters (1957)

 

The Promise

is that crab monster sleepy or bored?
or... is he BOTH?

This poster reminds me of something you'd see on an old pulp magazine cover, you know? The colors and style, I mean. Wonder who painted it? (One quick but semi-thorough search later...) I don't know. Nothing readily available on the web. Gotta be a book out there, or some specialist website or something, right? Well, if anybody knows clue me in.

As far as poster promises go, this one doesn't really go over the moon, does it? Just a big sleepy crab monster, holding swim-clad Pamela Duncan aloft in it's fearsome claw, preparing to tear her asunder. Some Sea Depths. A few Terror Tidal Waves.

I think those are supposed to be crab-monster-antenna or something on its face, right? But that poster makes it look like ol' CM's got jets of water squirting out of his nostrils instead. You agree? I'm not alone here, am I?

The Reality

(PPF)

corn on the crab for dinner tonight

Well honestly this film doesn't do too badly with its fulfillment. Crab is as described, mostly. A little smaller, maybe. Not quite as drowsy looking, which is probably a good thing.

Huh. Is it me or does this actually-in-the-movie crab monster look a little geriatric? "Damn you kids! Get off my beach or I'll gnaw you like an ear of corn at the county fair!"

I don't think Ms. Duncan ever actually gets held aloft by a crab in-film, but then it's been quite a few years since I've given it a proper watch. She does at least appear swim-clad while being menaced by a giant crab, as evidenced by this groovy behind the scenes photo I came across. 

Cool, huh?

if only these two film crew gents can distract the beast for a few more seconds
i can make it over to that out-of-shot motorbike and escape

Now, let's move along to the kitchen... ah, mall... kitchen store... to get us some knives to chop our - oh fuckit never mind. Chopping Mall is the next movie.

 

Chopping Mall (1986)

 

The Promise

i spy with my little eye

Not gonna lie. First time I saw this artwork I thought it was a zombie arm holding that shopping bag. I think it's the way those little indentations and stuff on the hand were done - they looked more like pus pockets or bite marks than they did, I dunno, robot rivets or whatever. And those wires coming out the elbow looked like veins or torn flesh. To me. And that first time, since I'm not a big zombie fan, I was probably a bit dismissive. 

But once I figured out it was supposed to be a robot arm, man I was all in. Specifically, it was an android robot arm. I mean, this poster clearly and unequivocally promises one or more killer androids rampaging through a shopping mall, does it not? 

I was SO EXCITED because I love killer android movies, and this was totally gonna be one of those. Killer androids are creepy, with their whole uncanny valley thing going on. You think it's a human being but something is just a little off and you don't know quite what until that first wound gets inflicted and OH MY GOD THERE ARE GEARS AND WIRES IN THAT PERSON'S ARM! Love the reveal. 

So much cooler than those lame little roly-poly-tank-tread robots like the one they had in Deadly Friend (1986)...

The Reality

(PPNF)

excuse me (deadly) friend, may i borrow your lawn mower

no. get your own fucking lawn mower, mall cop
Oh. Well then.

Now don't get me wrong, I love this movie. Own it on Blu-ray and pull it out for regular re-watches. But the first time I ever saw it, with that killer android poster art fueling my expectations... man was I pissed. 

And it's not like you gotta have a shit ton of money to make a decent lo-budge android - look no further than 1990's Crash and Burn for proof of that:

bill moseley in the lo-budge android makeup chair
lo-budge and holdin' a grudge

So yeah. Chopping Mall is not delivering on the very most important of it's promised promises. Bastards.

Still. A blast to watch. (And so is Deadly Friend.)

Okay. On to some intergalactic (or at least interplanetary) devilry.


Devil Girl From Mars (1954)

 

The Promise

i and my voluptuous curves menace you and so does my giant robot
who also has voluptuous curves

Definitely some promises being made here: We got menace. We got terror. We got a statuesque-lady-in-form-fitting-bodysuit, staring out impassively as she decides the FATE OF THE WORLD. We got male-fear-recoiling and female-leg-clutching. 

And we've got a damn cool looking robot henchman standing guard to the right, there. Run! Flee from the exceedingly cool giant robot!

The Reality

(PPNF)

and over here we have the latest model of our martian portable stereo console
and it costs less than you think!

Okay. Elephant in the room: Little misrepresentation on the robot front I think. I mean, we just finished talking about Chopping Mall, so I can't be too hard on this guy, right? He's at least got legs and feet, doesn't he?

But c'mon, scroll back up to that poster for a minute will you? Yes, poster-bot has legs as well. But that's honestly about the only similarity you'll find. Poster-bot also has gleaming metallic skin and swelling metal pecs and abs. Cool swishes and swips in his design. Poster-bot has hips for godssake!

Movie-bot has no hips. Movie-bot looks like that gigantic home stereo console, with phonograph, tuner and eight track all embedded in its depths, that I used to marvel at as a kid whenever we visited my grandma's house.

And the bot is not our only glaring misrepresentation, either. Let's take a gander at statuesque-lady-in-form-fitting-bodysuit, shall we?

couldn't find her ruler so gonna rap some knuckles with this kitchen mixer

Let me introduce you to stern-schoolmarm-from-mars. During summer break she moonlights selling intergalactic vintage home stereo consoles. With phonographs. And eight tracks. 

No fault of actress Patricia Laffan though - she wasn't a stern schoolmarm in real life. She was a lovely English stage, film, television and radio actress and also a fashion impresario, as we can see by this escalator portrait taken while not wearing her martian devil girl costume.

lovely woman

I had to look that up - fashion impresario. One of those terms I recognize but don't have more than a vague definition for. It means someone who is a creative force in the fashion industry who combines art and business to shape the fashion landscape. Good for her.

Oh. And while we're at it, this movie little to no fear-recoiling, and no leg-clutching either. This is one of the more stilted, low energy, talk-don't-show films I've seen. Characters stand about almost boredly discussing the FATE OF THE WORLD - discussers wanted, no leg-clutchers or fear-recoilers need apply.

Okay. Let's move a bit closer to home for the next film; maybe even head down onto the ol' bayou. (Insert chorus from "Down on the Bayou" into your head... NOW. Good song. Great band.)

 

Frogs (1972)

 

The Promise

ribwrist... ribwrist...

EVERY time I see this poster art I think of a giant frog who for whatever reason decided to have his frog tongue surgically swapped out with a human forearm. That's weird, right? 

Why would he do that?

Anyway, poster promises: for sure we're being promised a giant frog or two - that guy on the poster is the size of a small to medium-sized dog. Looks apparent that we'll have some humans-as-frog's-breakfast, too. Nature will be striking back, with large (tidal waves are large) amounts of slithering, devouring and destroying.

The Reality

(PPNF)

oh the horror!
i am not putting that cake anywhere near my mouth

So yeah. In spite of being a reasonably fun watch, this film includes no giant frogs. Or giant anything else's. Also no people-eating. Some people-killing, to be sure, but no eating. 

On the plus side, it's got a lot more than angry frogs going for it. Has a whole swamp-full of angry vengeance seeking critters - snakes, spiders, lizards and more. 

Although to be honest the animal wranglers had a pretty tough time getting any of those critters to look awake and interested, let alone angry and vengeance-seeking. Hard to blame the handlers. Reptiles and insects have a notoriously limited range when it comes to acting.

Also, this movie has a baby-faced-sans-mustache Sam Elliott in it, which is it's own fun.

master of the lip bonsai
And WHAT Sam Elliott has been married to Katharine Ross since 1984?! I had no idea...

 

Great White (1981) 

 

The Promise

look let's not haggle that's an amazing poster amirite

Let's be honest it would be tough for nearly any film to do this poster proud, especially back in 1981 - this is a GREAT poster. 

And this poster's promise is all about the fish. A Megalodon-sized fish. A crafty, stealthy son-of-a-fitch fish. A fish who gleefully, even wickedly grins as he prepares to snarf down his unsuspecting morsel, which morsel only wanted a nice tan and is that reason enough to be kilt off by a Wicked Megalodon Fitch? It is not. 

We mourn this morsel as we know corpses do not keep their tans long at all.

The Reality

(PPNF)

rubber duckie you're the one
you make bath time lots of fun
rubber duckie i'm awfully fond of you

A big, plastic, bobbing fish head, with two guys under the water, holding it upright so it doesn't just upend and float away. Okay, I have no idea if there are two guys underneath holding it in place, or even what it's made of, but that shark prop is shit. 

Movie's a fun watch, though, as long as you go into with the right attitude. (Hint: "I can't wait to see these amazing shark effects!" is not the right attitude.)

Onward to an invasion... of sorts.

 

Invasion of the Saucer-Men (1957)

 

The Promise

i don't know what to say except that i still long to see the movie this poster promises

This one is also a great poster. Maybe not as iconic a feeling as the one Great White has going for it, but still. And this poster just lays it all out for you, right? You will...

SEE teenagers vs. the (gigantic!) Saucer-men! 

SEE disembodied hand that crawls! 

SEE night the world nearly ended! 

SEE earth (or at the very least one of its larger cities) attacked by (three if not more) flying saucers!

The Reality

(PPNF)

come to hollywood they said
it'll be a thrill a minute they said

Okay, first things first: hard to imagine any of these fellows holding a full grown woman aloft in one hand. A little hard to imagine even if all three worked together using both hands.

And I know, it's a bit of a cheek to compare a behind the scenes photo to the excitement of that poster. But honestly, this photo is pretty indicative of the film as a whole.

As for world-ending, large cities and multiple saucers, it's been awhile but what I remember is a small backwoods town and just one saucer that I think the army blows up without meaning to. 

The crawling hand is totally delivered on, though.

But like some of the others, this is also a fun little film and, in spite of it's PPNF status, filled with charm and purposefully silly dialogue. Based on a short story that ends a bit more darkly than this movie does, as well. Just sayin'.

So, on to the next movie, lest we lose track of time and forget...

 

The Land That Time Forgot (1974)

 

The Promise

wait is that 2013's Poseidon Rex down in that corner, way back in 1974?

Well, I just love this film so you're not gonna see a lot of hate from me here. And I will say that pretty much everything we see on that poster, we also see in the film. Except the aquatic T-Rex/Allosaur.

The Reality

(PPF)

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Well. Loving the movie as well as feeling like it lives up to its poster promise clearly does not stop me from including this hilarious animated GIF. Way too good to pass up.

The GIF, in fact, makes the movie's effects out to be much worse than they are in reel life. The film's dinos were actually quite nicely realized (mostly as rod puppets) by a very talented fellow name of Roger Dicken.

And lest you wonder, by "very talented" I mean to say he also worked on movies like The Blood Beast Terror (1968), 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968), Witchfinder General (1968), When Dinosaurs Ruled the Earth (1970), Scars of Dracula (1970), Alien (1979), Warlords of the Deep (1978), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), White Dog (1982), and The Hunger (1983). 

Nuff said. On to the very last film: The... stinger... if you will.

 

The Wasp Woman (1959) 

 

The Promise

creepy

Well this is a pretty bizarre poster, I gotta say. Kind of a cinch it's not going to deliver due to that bizarreness on it's own. Seems like it's giving more of a "this is what the film will feel like" kind of vibe rather than straight up promising a giant wasp-woman.

But I would surely have paid a few bucks back in the day to see a giant-ass wasp with a woman's head and face, clutching some poor devil as she reels him in to his demise. (Quint would've said "...reels him in to his demeeeeeeeese." If his character were in this film, I mean.) 

Anyway, as far as promises go we have the giant wasp. We have "a beautiful woman." A "lusting queen wasp." Then we've got a wee struggling man and a pile of bones. 

Promises fulfilled?

The Reality

(PPNF)

i kill men after cleaning their pipes with my pipe cleaner antenna

No. While Susan Cabot gives a fine performance (finer than the film itself, I think) this one is shakes out as PPNF on the lack of giant wasp-ness alone.

I mean, as far as the "beautiful woman" promise goes, Cabot delivers. She was both beautiful and quite talented. The "lusting queen wasp" promise - I don't remember lust playing into the film at all, to be honest. Well, not sexual lust. Probably they were going for blood-lusting queen wasp, though. Which we do get. 

And the wee struggling man atop pile of bones... I'm gonna say no again. It's been (quite) a few years since I've watched this one all the way through, but I'm not remembering an any-sized pile of human remains in the film, let alone a big ol' pile like the poster promises. 

And, of course, since there was no giant wasp in the movie we could have no wee man struggling in its clutches.



 

And that's it, my friends. Our work here is done and the tally is:

PPF - 2

PPNF - 7

 

Until next time...

Saturday, January 12, 2019

Croc (2007) & Crocodile (2000)


&


never happens in movie
also never happens in movie
Well, it's January and time for everyone's favorite New Year tradition: The Killer Crocodile Double Feature. (Okay, that's not really a tradition, even here in the deadmans household.)

What actually happened was more where mrs. deadmans falls asleep on the couch while I watch something she'd rather not experience in a fully conscious state, which I totally understand. (There are times I wish I was the one sleeping on the couch next to me.)

Okay, that was weird. I went all unbidden-existential on myself for a second and saw movie-watching-me on my couch, taking in a crappy movie, with sleeping-me curled up right there next to myself. Snoring a little. Huh. At least sleeping-me wasn't laying his head on movie-watching-me's lap. That would've been too weird.

Anyway, existentials aside, neither of the movies I real-life-watched were overly painful (the missus totally could've stayed awake!), and the second one was even a fair bit of fun. Also, the two films didn't start out as a crocodilian couple: they just happened to be next to each other on my watchlist, and one night I decided to give the first one a shot. Well, it turned out to be so unsatisfying (un-sauri-fying, you might say), I had no choice but to give myself a redo with the second movie the next night. At which point my crocodilian-film-faith was restored. (Whew. Close call.)

At any rate that's the setup, and here's a mini multi movies write-up on both films....



It's Hunting Season and You're the Prey


So the first movie was a 2007 made-for-TV deal called Croc. The first bit of opening credits actually had me wondering if I'd be watching a full-on-Thai-subtitled-in-English film, which would've rocked: I've got a big and mushy spot in my heart for all things Thai. Wasn't to be, though. The movie's actually an English-language American production that was produced and filmed in Thailand.

As a matter of fact, I later found out this movie is part of that Maneater Series SyFy did back in the day. (Anyone besides me remember that series?) I caught at least a half dozen Maneater films, there in the mid-to-late aughts. Well: Strip my gears and call me shiftless, turns out the series never died and is now up to 27 movies, the last one just a few years old. (Where the heck have I been?)

Anyway, this particular movie's about a twenty foot saltwater crocodile terrorizing a (Thailand) tourist beach town. Here's the blurb from Amazon Video:
When a mysterious beast begins dismembering locals at a Thailand beach resort, Croc Hawkins sets out to capture the monster - and the $5,000 reward. But as the body count rises, Croc suspects he is dealing with a more powerful force than he ever imagined.
Would your boat do this if it was headbutted by a giant crocodile?
I'm not sure it would....
Yeah.... That's not accurate and actually sounds better than what I watched. This movie was a bit of a plodder --- even the creature scenes couldn't quite lift it out of the humdrums for me. Heck, not even having the Honorable Michael Madsen onboard was enough to get to minimum fun factor, and Madsen always brightens up the projects he's part of. Couldn't quite do it here though, bless 'im.

So why exactly did it suck?

Hmm... the effects were pretty bad. This was one of those ultra-cheap practical effect/ultra-cheap CGI mixes. Which is better than going all ultra-cheap CGI. (Generally speaking, cheap practical ends up looking way better than cheap CGI.) But you know, the second film I watched also mixed cheap practical and CGI, and it was way more enjoyable, so that can't be all that's holding this one back....

(thinkingthinking)

Okay, I think it came down to this: this movie didn't quite know what it wanted to be --- it couldn't commit. I mean it was definitely marketed as creature feature, but the film was really a mishmash of drama, romance, action thriller and family film, with an unconvincing bit of creature horror thrown in. Yeah, the more I think about it that's exactly what happened --- too many things going on in it to be able to do any one (or two) of them well.

Too bad. I will say I got the sense most everyone in front and behind the camera was putting out best effort, which means the movie at least comes away having a bit of heart once all's said and done. But even with the heart, I could only find it in my heart to give this film:

ONE AND A HALF LARGEST-LIVING-PLASTIC-AND-CGI-REPTILE BRAINS

And that, is all I have to say about it.



Ever feel like something is watching you...?


Now then, the second film (Tobe Hooper's 2000 straight-to-video Crocodile) was pretty much everything that first movie wasn't. This one knew exactly what it was going for --- teen-stereotype-creature-horror --- implemented with tongue firmly in cheek. I mean its characters were so achingly one dimensional it was ludicrous, but since everyone involved seemed to know that and be going about it on purpose, it comes off as self-aware and the stereotypes are fun rather than demeaning.

Here's the Prime blurb for it:
A group of friends goes out on a boat trip on a lake in Southern California - but their joyful weekend turns into horror when a giant killer crocodile, searching for its stolen eggs, picks off anyone who gets in its way. Can they all escape in one piece or will they slowly and painfully fall to the mammoth reptile?
"Can they all escape..."? Do we even need to ask that question? (No. We do not.)

So yeah, this thing was actually a lot of fun. It starred no one who went on to do much else, according to IMDB, but everybody did what they needed to here in guilty-pleasure-inducing ways. And it pulls off the horror/comedy bit just about perfectly. I'll bet I could name all the horror comedies I actually enjoy watching on one hand, and believe it or not this movie just became one of 'em.

I am SO dead! Except for my right hand, which is alive and tightly gripping
this plastic crocodile mouth so I don't slip out onto the floor....
Wait, one hand...?

Let's see: An American Werewolf in London, Shaun of the Dead, Young Frankenstein, Dale and Tucker vs. Evil, Invasion of the Saucer-Men, The Rocky Horror Picture Show, Lake Placid, Eight Legged Freaks.... Huh. Okay, maybe two hands. Possibly three.

Damn it, now I've negated the whole "on one hand" thing I had going back there, and I might not even hate horror comedy the way I've always thought I did. (Sigh.)

I don't know. Maybe I just hate horror comedy that isn't well done. Yeah, that could be it. It is a genre that's tough to get right, don't you think? Anyway. I digress.

Getting back to Crocodile, I'm thinking to myself that even though I compared the two, the creature effects in this one didn't suck nearly as much as that first film's did. Here they (wisely) kept to the practical side of things, leaving CGI to the few bits they couldn't think of another way to manage, which helped a ton on watchability. That first one had more crappy CGI than practical going on.

Okay, that's it I think. I'm done talking about this one as well.

Oh. The count?

THREE AND A HALF SELF-AWARE TONGUE IN TOOTH BRAINS

(Gronk!)



Till next time.

Thursday, February 15, 2018

Death Spa (1989) Prom Night (1980) Hello Mary Lou: Prom Night II (1987)

You know, I've decided my half-brains look too much like full-brains: one-and-a-halfs look like twos, two-and-a-halfs look like threes, and so on.

I'll have to do something about that. Sometime.

Anyway we've got mini multi movies here, and the name of the game today is five--as in five things to say about each film ('cause why not?). These movies all belong to a category my sister and I affectionately/disdainfully named "boob-slashers" when we were kids.

We didn't come up with that name because women were (necessarily) being depicted having their breasts lacerated by a sharp instrument; more because the film-type always seemed to include a fair number of topless women, screaming and running away from knife (and other assorted instrument)-wielding maniacs of one type or another. So, y'know, the movies contained both boobs and slashers.

Yeah. It was an interesting childhood. On to the movies.

You'll sweat blood!
  1. An American movie, filmed in '87, straight-to-VHS (in Japan!) in '89, and finally to eager (?) American VCR owners in 1990.
  2. Weirdly, that cover is a not unreasonable representation of what you get after you press Play. And that's not (altogether) a good thing.
  3. The movie features a possessed cross-dressing man, whose body transforms back and forth from his own to his dead sister's.
  4. There are "Death Spa Dancers" in the film. I know this because they're named that very thing in the credits.
  5. So not a good movie, but... weirdly watchable.
ONE-AND-A-HALF ANGRY SPA GHOST BRAINS

 This year Prom Night will be a scream.
  1. Nothing supernatural here--I had this movie confused with its sequel. (Hadn't actually seen either one before last weekend.)
  2. This is kind of a good movie (he says sheepishly)--reasonably decent mystery, plenty of interesting suspects, and fairly suspense-y.
  3. Contains and awesome disco dance off. (Also features Leslie Nielsen disco dancing--slightly less awesome.)
  4. I kind of want Seymour Crane's van.
  5. Online-ness tells me there were a lot of scenes cut from the film. I think if they were put back in, its story would make more sense (but it's totally okay as-is).



THREE-AND-A-HALF CLASSY-TRASH BRAINS

 Vengeance never rests in peace!
  1. Originally, this was not even a sequel to Prom Night. It was called The Haunting of Hamilton High and totally unrelated until some suit had the bright idea to cash in on Prom Night's name/success. Re-shoots ensued. I bet it would've been better if they'd kept it as-was.
  2. The movie features possession by immersion in liquefied chalkboard. That's pretty fresh thinking.
  3. Also, its main character gets shot to death and then a full-size zombie claws its way out of her body. But don't worry, she pops out of a box at movie's end, and she's just fine! And, by the way, that zombie is a regenerating one and it's awesome.
  4. Vickie Carpenter's mother is by far the scariest character in the movie, but that creepy rocking horse is a close second.
  5. Michael Ironside is not John Saxon.

TWO-AND-A-HALF HELL-BOUND-HARLOT BRAINS

You remember Lady Battle Cop's Universal Movie Law? If that were in effect here (and it is), we'd be looking at:
  1. Enjoyably Bad
  2. Enjoyably Good
  3. Enjoyably Bad
'Nuff said? (I believe it is.)

Wednesday, January 17, 2018

Mystery of the Wax Museum (1933) & House(s) of Wax (1953 & 2005)

So I did three things this week. Of course I did more than just three things. (A week is a long time--a person does all manner of things in a week.) What I mean is there are three deadmans-related things I did, which bear bringing up here at The Brain. The three things I did was to watch three movies--three associated movies (kinda like on Sesame Street).

You read the post title, so you already know what movies I watched:
  1. House of Wax (1953)
  2. House of Wax (2005)
  3. Mystery of the Wax Museum (1933)
Full disclosure, that list feels weird to me because it's in neither ascending or descending order. But it IS in the order I watched the movies so I'm sticking with it. (The pain, the pain of mixed-up lists! I will survive.)

Now it's no secret my mind is a Comparing one and, being recently turned on to 1953's House of Wax by the hard working podcasters over at Decades of Horror: The Classic Era, I found myself scratching an itch to visit/revisit the movie and its film-siblings. And three movies in a week's time is nothing if not a fine excuse for a mini multi movies post, so here we are (with a mini multi movies post). Nothing too in-depth--just posters and a few random-y thoughts on each.


House of Wax (1953)

So I watched this one first, and guess what? It's a seriously creepy little film. Certainly more creepy than the uninspiring movie poster here would have you believe.

And you know what else? It's one I've never watched all the way through until this very week. (How did that happen, you ask?) Well, it happened because I've never sought it out, being more of a creature feature guy and none too keen on movie psychopaths in general. Of course I'm familiar with the film, having read about it and caught bits on TV over the years, but sitting down to it this week has me quite sure I'd never seen it beginning to end.

At any rate, the movie's got a lot going for it. Vincent Price, for one thing, and backed by a solid cast. The plot's basically about "a disfigured sculptor who repopulates his destroyed wax museum by murdering people and using their wax-coated corpses as displays." (So says Wikipedia; so say we all.)

Nothing supernatural or monster-y going on with that plot, but you gotta admit "wax-coated corpses" is a pretty creepy premise all by itself. Anyway, the movie's beautifully shot, the story plays out nicely, and the whole thing builds up a satisfying level of tension as it moves along toward its climax. All in all, it's an above average 50s horror film, in my (reasonably) humble opinion.

Truth be known (and speaking of reasonable opinions), this is really a four brain movie. Only reason I didn't go there is, like I said, I'm not a fan of movie psychopaths--and even an above average one just isn't my cup of tea. As tea goes, it was a good cuppa but with my own predilections in mind, I went ahead and gave this four brain movie just:

THREE AND A HALF WAXEN-MUMMIFIED BRAINS


House of Wax (2005)

I watched this one next and, unfortunately, it's one I had seen in the past. I don't remember if it was in-theater or a home-rental.... Must've been a rental--can't imagine having sought this out in a theater. Anyway, about all I remembered until my re-watch was that I hadn't cared for it much.

With memory now painfully refreshed, I can tell you exactly what I didn't like: it has a lazy script which swaps out engaging plot for sadistic gore and torture, delivers not an ounce of creepiness, and very little suspense. (Again, my (reasonably) humble opinion.)

This film is far from a direct remake of the 1953 film, in spite of sharing its title, and it's a fair example of why I generally steer clear of slasher flicks. That's right: the movie takes an above-average 50s horror film and turns it into run-of-the-mill-slasher-fare. Blech. (Blech, I say!)

So anyway, the plot is basically this (paraphrased from IMDB): "A group of friends on their way to a college football game falls prey to a pair of murderous brothers in an abandoned small town. They discover the brothers have expanded upon the area's main attraction, a House of Wax, and filled the entire town with wax-coated corpses." Many killer hillbilly stereotypes and hi-jinks ensue.

I will say the film had some fairly impressive visual effects going for it, though. And I thought Elisha Cuthbert and Chad Michael Murray gave a nice performances. Not their fault the movie sucked rocks.

ONE UNIMAGINATIVELY RETREADED BRAIN


Mystery of the Wax Museum (1933)

You know, this is a tiny bit disturbing to me, but I'm going through Fay Wray's filmography online and not seeing anything besides King Kong that I remember actually having watched. (That can't be right, can it?) I remember seeing her in a few Perry Mason episodes... and I might've watched The Most Dangerous Game back in the day. Well, I've now seen her in this film, so that makes at least two (if not three) in my pocket. Still, I need to get busy....

At any rate this wax-movie easily has the coolest theatrical poster of the group, in my opinion. I just like that Art Deco look it has going on. Classy.

And apparently this was one of the very last films to feature Two-color Technicolor Process 3, using B&W film behind red and green filters. From what I read the public wasn't too enthralled with Process 3's look, but I thought it made this particular movie hauntingly beautiful to watch.

Can't say the plot flowed anywhere near as well as the 1953 film's did, and I honestly think that second film was better in most every way (sorry Fay). Best thing about this 1933 version? Glenda Farrell--she totally stole the show. Worth a watch just to see her energetically hard-boiled reporter manically bounce around the screen.

So yeah, I quite enjoyed this one, even if for mostly historical kinds of reasons--fun to see the two color process, enjoyable if dated performances, interesting pre-code content, etc. Not up to par with 1953's remake, though, so it's getting:

THREE RED AND GREEN TECHNICOLOR BRAINS



Now, here's something I didn't do this week--I didn't read the short story these films all originated from--seems it was never published. Which didn't stop me from poking around, trying to find a copy of the thing. Sadly, not a shred of luck to be had there. The story was "The Wax Works" by Charles S. Belden. Apparently the guy also wrote a play called The Wax Museum (had to be related, right?) which was also never produced. Maybe the 1933 film was an amalgam of the two efforts (he said, purely guessing). Either one would be a fun read.

Alright I'm done. I was gonna tell you about that time I was a little kid and visited a wax museum with my folks and a guy dressed as a Keystone Cop pretended to be a wax statue and then pretended to start tipping over when my brother and I went up and touched him, with my folks standing back and (in on the joke) laughing all the while.
Desperate Dan: Mom! Help! It's tipping over! Help us!
Mirthful Mom: Oh no, son. You got yourself into this; you've gotta get yourself out!
Scarred for life.

Well, I guess I did kind of just tell you about it. But not in as much detail as I'd have liked. And without the picture of all of us in our seventies-garbed glory, gathered round a waxen Frankenstein's Monster, from that same visit. Maybe another time. I'm feeling done with this post, riiight..........

..........NOW!

Tuesday, February 28, 2017

Ice Sharks (2016) & Planet of the Sharks (2016)

So there I was, sifting through the new arrivals for Amazon Prime on the TV set.

With the missus out for the evening, I figured it was time for a little popcorn and a Dan Movie, "Dan Movie" being defined as any of the admittedly few films the missus just can't bring herself, in all her love and good-naturedness, to sit through alongside me as I watch. (And who knows, she might've been up for at least one of these two if she'd been home. But I kind of doubt it.)

Anyway, while sifting, I came across these two titles sitting right next to each other in the list. And since both looked like they might pass the minimum bar I hold for shark movies (i.e. any sharks portrayed are more or less of a natural state--not undead, roboticized, etc.--and also limit themselves to life in the water--no sand or snow burrowing, no sustained flying about in the air, and so on), I decided to give the trailers a watch. And I was actually excited when I did.

Why was I excited? Well, it wasn't because either movie appeared to be that (apparently mythical) film I've been looking for ever since the summer of 1975: a shark movie that holds even a dim, flickering candle to Jaws. No, neither of these looked to have particularly watertight (*NPI) plots, outstanding effects or remarkable performances. Even so, I was excited. The reason is, watching their trailers, I realized both movies actually take themselves and their audiences (kind of) seriously. And it is not often, my friend, that a shark movie does that.
*No Pun Intended

Well, now that I say it, I guess The Shallows was serious. And Bait 3D at least worked hard trying to be serious. But c'mon, you gotta admit the vast, vast majority of recent shark films have not only been atrocious but have run an exceedingly narrow gamut between tongue-firmly-in-cheek and outright parody. (And I'm sorry but I just cannot do tongue-in-cheek, let alone parody, with a shark movie. I just can't.)

To be sure, these two films have their shark-related gimmicks. Going completely gimmick-free is (apparently) more than I can hope for, but these films come closer than most have done in quite awhile. At the very least, there's no mention of sharks being whipped around inside tornadoes, swimming under the soil, having 2 or even 3 heads, and there were no sharktopuses, sharkensteins or airliner-snatching mega sharks to be seen anywhere. These movies pretty much stick (again, for the most part) to sharks. The kind that just swim. In the water. And like I said, both movies played it reasonably straight, to boot. No (excessive) actor-hamming, no breaking the fourth wall, etc.

I can't say any of the actors in either film are people I've seen anywhere else, and according to IMDB most of their collective work has been in movies of similar vein, but I also didn't get a sense that anyone involved was noticeably untalented. I admit there was a little watch checking going on during both films as they chugged along to their respective climaxes, but I think the mild impatience I experienced at times was more related to plotting than performances. I could see pretty much everybody in front of the cameras producing decent work, providing they had the right creative teams around them. At any rate, I was damn grateful to have any shark movie to watch which wasn't blatantly farcical.

So here's a bit about each film, and I honestly think you could do worse than give them a watch some weekend, when you're already bored and not particularly worried about losing that few hours of your life these movies will take and never give back.



Ice Sharks


So the deal here is there are a bunch of folks at an arctic research station who come across (or get camed across by) a "previously unknown variation" of Greenland sharks, lured in from who knows where due to global warming. Well, these sharks (unlike your garden variety Greenland shark) can swim at speeds of more than one mile per hour and will ravenously attack anything on, in or near the water.

Oh, and they're pack animals, too. Wolf-like, the sharks work together to separate and snack on our heroes, who eventually end up sunken (in their mostly air tight station) on the ocean floor, with hungry sharks all around them. Shenanigans and plot holes abound, until eventually those destined to survive do (survive I mean).

So yeah, nothing like that beast on the poster, but there are some twenty plus footers in the movie, and apparently that's accurate for the species in real life. Not that the filmmakers tried especially hard to have these things look life-like, a good thing, since real-world Greenlands are pretty unassuming in spite of their size. As you see below.

You can also see that the movie's sharks don't entirely stay in the water. That's okay, they don't in the next movie either. It's all still a damn site better than witnessing the horror that was Sharknado....

Unassuming Real Greenland SharkDeadly Ice Sharks Greenland Shark

TWO AND A HALF EYE-PARASITE BRAINS

You'll have to do a little research to be in the know on that parasite reference. Oh, and nice callback to John Carpenter's 1982 take on The Thing, what with this movie's rescue ship crew all being named after Carpenter's (and the original novella's) arctic research crew. Well done, with that.



Planet of the Sharks


Well the culprit here is (again) global warming: it's melted all the polar ice and 98% of the planet is underwater. Most of the planet's human population has died out, and those left have adapted to life on top of the water in the form of boats and little towns made from tied-together rafts.

Some scientist types have scrounged together just enough technological scraps to have a go at launching a whatzit into the upper atmosphere, which they hope will reverse the warming and refreeze the ice caps to get a little more land mass available for everyone. (Yeah, the "science" in the film is a little dubious, but I'm rolling with it.)

Unfortunately, about this time it becomes apparent some sharks (at least the one we see in this movie) have evolved to be able to control other sharks via some kind of hive mind, and as a result sharks have learned to attack and kill people on top of the water by leaping out and knocking the intended victim into the water. And then munching upon them.

So anyway, stuff happens and people windsurf while being chased by highly-evolved-alpha-sharks and scientists eventually save the planet as alpha sharks are destroyed and land does indeed (eventually) reappear as credits roll.

Alpha Sharks have glowey ampullae of Lorenzini......and make other sharks do this.

So yeah. This one wasn't quite as good, overall, as Ice Sharks. But it was watchable. In the right circumstances (like the ones I was in). No super obvious character callouts this time (both films were made by the same company, so I thought there might be), although we did get a character named Dr. Roy Shaw, which has gotta be an amalgam of Roy Scheider and Robert Shaw, doesn't it? (Although I suppose whoever named the character might've also just been a fan of this guy.) And then we get a Dr. Caroline Munroe, which I figure has to be a Hammer Horror reference, right? Not that Hammer ever made a shark movie (and not that she was only ever in Hammer films, but she never did a shark film at all, far as I know). Yeah. So anyway.

TWO GLOWEY ALPHA BRAINS