Showing posts with label prehistoric beasts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label prehistoric beasts. Show all posts

Monday, February 24, 2025

Better a Broken (Poster) Promise Than None at All

Mark Twain said that. 

The thing about promises. Well, minus the (poster) part.

Supposedly he was commenting on the idea that even if a promise gets broken, having at least made it in the first place shows some amount of good intention. I don't know if that's always the case in real life, but it's a nice sentiment. 

Now you might be asking why this particular quote is bumping around in the ol' (deadmans) brain today. And if you are, the answer would be 'cause I've been scrolling through the ol' deadmans Letterboxd watched list, and reflecting on a few films I've seen where Poster Promises either were or were Not Fulfilled (PPF or PPNF). 

And of course I didn't just fall off the turnip truck. In fact, I'm a long time passenger on the advertising-exists-to-sell-things-not-to-tell-the-truth-about-them truck. I've been buying questionable things out of the back of that truck for many a year, truth be told. So I get it: you promise what you need to in order to make the sale. 

Still. Some take this philosophy further than others. I mean, there's breaking a promise and then there's shattering a promise into tiny sharp shards that cut you until blood makes a heart shaped stain on your soul.

That went a little dark.

Really I just thought I'd throw out a few vintage creature features where a poster promised more, creature-wise, than a film actually delivered. Or maybe some did deliver. I guess we'll see. 

As I go I'll say a word or two about each, whatever springs to mind. Unless nothing springs, which sometimes happens. Fair warning.

So here we go. In alphabetical order, cause that's how I'm rolling today.


A*P*E (1976) 

 

The Promise

not to be confused

Let's see... we got giant shark defied... 

(sorry to insert but every time i read "giant shark defied" my brain changes it to "giant shark defiled" and i don't like the image that brings up for me in my head. no, i do not like it at all. end of insert.)

city destroyed... ocean liner demolished... giant "monster reptile" snake vanquished... apparently all at the same time. Fury of the ten-ton variety. Screen-leaping (and to be fair the film was actually shot in 3D). 

Whew! So much going on here! I'm excited to see this epic story play out...

The Reality

(PPNF)

i am a giant ape
this is not a toy cow

Um... smallish man... ill-fitting ape suit... someone's back lawn... tiny plastic cow. 

Of course, technically the movie did have shark battling-city destroying-ship sinking-snake vanquishing stuff in it, but it was all plastic cow-level shark battling-city destroying-ship sinking-snake vanquishing stuff. Definitely not as promised.

Anyway, I recall my first viewing of this film. That Not Kong Not Jaws Grudge Match was pretty much the first scene of the movie and not only was it was over QUICK, I remember thinking "that little shark the actor is throwing around is dead. They killed a baby shark for this thing." I don't know if that's true but it looked dead.

Hmm... wait. You know, now that I think about it, my very VERY first, pre-poster, eyes-on artwork for this film was more likely the amazing cover Bob Larkin did for Famous Monsters of Filmland #146 below. Check it out:

pretty sure in this version of things the ape was eaten by the shark
swimmer was dessert
 

What an eyeball-feast this cover is! Shark is definitely front and center here. And our poor cover-ape (heroic, unlike his movie-ape twin) is trying so hard to keep his human-lady-love (who never even meets the shark in-film) from being chomped down upon. Doesn't look like he's doing too good a job of things though. Great painting nonetheless. Even if it, too, does not fulfill promises.

Moving on to the next movie... and please be patient as I prep it - no need to get crabby.

 

Attack of the Crab Monsters (1957)

 

The Promise

is that crab monster sleepy or bored?
or... is he BOTH?

This poster reminds me of something you'd see on an old pulp magazine cover, you know? The colors and style, I mean. Wonder who painted it? (One quick but semi-thorough search later...) I don't know. Nothing readily available on the web. Gotta be a book out there, or some specialist website or something, right? Well, if anybody knows clue me in.

As far as poster promises go, this one doesn't really go over the moon, does it? Just a big sleepy crab monster, holding swim-clad Pamela Duncan aloft in it's fearsome claw, preparing to tear her asunder. Some Sea Depths. A few Terror Tidal Waves.

I think those are supposed to be crab-monster-antenna or something on its face, right? But that poster makes it look like ol' CM's got jets of water squirting out of his nostrils instead. You agree? I'm not alone here, am I?

The Reality

(PPF)

corn on the crab for dinner tonight

Well honestly this film doesn't do too badly with its fulfillment. Crab is as described, mostly. A little smaller, maybe. Not quite as drowsy looking, which is probably a good thing.

Huh. Is it me or does this actually-in-the-movie crab monster look a little geriatric? "Damn you kids! Get off my beach or I'll gnaw you like an ear of corn at the county fair!"

I don't think Ms. Duncan ever actually gets held aloft by a crab in-film, but then it's been quite a few years since I've given it a proper watch. She does at least appear swim-clad while being menaced by a giant crab, as evidenced by this groovy behind the scenes photo I came across. 

Cool, huh?

if only these two film crew gents can distract the beast for a few more seconds
i can make it over to that out-of-shot motorbike and escape

Now, let's move along to the kitchen... ah, mall... kitchen store... to get us some knives to chop our - oh fuckit never mind. Chopping Mall is the next movie.

 

Chopping Mall (1986)

 

The Promise

i spy with my little eye

Not gonna lie. First time I saw this artwork I thought it was a zombie arm holding that shopping bag. I think it's the way those little indentations and stuff on the hand were done - they looked more like pus pockets or bite marks than they did, I dunno, robot rivets or whatever. And those wires coming out the elbow looked like veins or torn flesh. To me. And that first time, since I'm not a big zombie fan, I was probably a bit dismissive. 

But once I figured out it was supposed to be a robot arm, man I was all in. Specifically, it was an android robot arm. I mean, this poster clearly and unequivocally promises one or more killer androids rampaging through a shopping mall, does it not? 

I was SO EXCITED because I love killer android movies, and this was totally gonna be one of those. Killer androids are creepy, with their whole uncanny valley thing going on. You think it's a human being but something is just a little off and you don't know quite what until that first wound gets inflicted and OH MY GOD THERE ARE GEARS AND WIRES IN THAT PERSON'S ARM! Love the reveal. 

So much cooler than those lame little roly-poly-tank-tread robots like the one they had in Deadly Friend (1986)...

The Reality

(PPNF)

excuse me (deadly) friend, may i borrow your lawn mower

no. get your own fucking lawn mower, mall cop
Oh. Well then.

Now don't get me wrong, I love this movie. Own it on Blu-ray and pull it out for regular re-watches. But the first time I ever saw it, with that killer android poster art fueling my expectations... man was I pissed. 

And it's not like you gotta have a shit ton of money to make a decent lo-budge android - look no further than 1990's Crash and Burn for proof of that:

bill moseley in the lo-budge android makeup chair
lo-budge and holdin' a grudge

So yeah. Chopping Mall is not delivering on the very most important of it's promised promises. Bastards.

Still. A blast to watch. (And so is Deadly Friend.)

Okay. On to some intergalactic (or at least interplanetary) devilry.


Devil Girl From Mars (1954)

 

The Promise

i and my voluptuous curves menace you and so does my giant robot
who also has voluptuous curves

Definitely some promises being made here: We got menace. We got terror. We got a statuesque-lady-in-form-fitting-bodysuit, staring out impassively as she decides the FATE OF THE WORLD. We got male-fear-recoiling and female-leg-clutching. 

And we've got a damn cool looking robot henchman standing guard to the right, there. Run! Flee from the exceedingly cool giant robot!

The Reality

(PPNF)

and over here we have the latest model of our martian portable stereo console
and it costs less than you think!

Okay. Elephant in the room: Little misrepresentation on the robot front I think. I mean, we just finished talking about Chopping Mall, so I can't be too hard on this guy, right? He's at least got legs and feet, doesn't he?

But c'mon, scroll back up to that poster for a minute will you? Yes, poster-bot has legs as well. But that's honestly about the only similarity you'll find. Poster-bot also has gleaming metallic skin and swelling metal pecs and abs. Cool swishes and swips in his design. Poster-bot has hips for godssake!

Movie-bot has no hips. Movie-bot looks like that gigantic home stereo console, with phonograph, tuner and eight track all embedded in its depths, that I used to marvel at as a kid whenever we visited my grandma's house.

And the bot is not our only glaring misrepresentation, either. Let's take a gander at statuesque-lady-in-form-fitting-bodysuit, shall we?

couldn't find her ruler so gonna rap some knuckles with this kitchen mixer

Let me introduce you to stern-schoolmarm-from-mars. During summer break she moonlights selling intergalactic vintage home stereo consoles. With phonographs. And eight tracks. 

No fault of actress Patricia Laffan though - she wasn't a stern schoolmarm in real life. She was a lovely English stage, film, television and radio actress and also a fashion impresario, as we can see by this escalator portrait taken while not wearing her martian devil girl costume.

lovely woman

I had to look that up - fashion impresario. One of those terms I recognize but don't have more than a vague definition for. It means someone who is a creative force in the fashion industry who combines art and business to shape the fashion landscape. Good for her.

Oh. And while we're at it, this movie little to no fear-recoiling, and no leg-clutching either. This is one of the more stilted, low energy, talk-don't-show films I've seen. Characters stand about almost boredly discussing the FATE OF THE WORLD - discussers wanted, no leg-clutchers or fear-recoilers need apply.

Okay. Let's move a bit closer to home for the next film; maybe even head down onto the ol' bayou. (Insert chorus from "Down on the Bayou" into your head... NOW. Good song. Great band.)

 

Frogs (1972)

 

The Promise

ribwrist... ribwrist...

EVERY time I see this poster art I think of a giant frog who for whatever reason decided to have his frog tongue surgically swapped out with a human forearm. That's weird, right? 

Why would he do that?

Anyway, poster promises: for sure we're being promised a giant frog or two - that guy on the poster is the size of a small to medium-sized dog. Looks apparent that we'll have some humans-as-frog's-breakfast, too. Nature will be striking back, with large (tidal waves are large) amounts of slithering, devouring and destroying.

The Reality

(PPNF)

oh the horror!
i am not putting that cake anywhere near my mouth

So yeah. In spite of being a reasonably fun watch, this film includes no giant frogs. Or giant anything else's. Also no people-eating. Some people-killing, to be sure, but no eating. 

On the plus side, it's got a lot more than angry frogs going for it. Has a whole swamp-full of angry vengeance seeking critters - snakes, spiders, lizards and more. 

Although to be honest the animal wranglers had a pretty tough time getting any of those critters to look awake and interested, let alone angry and vengeance-seeking. Hard to blame the handlers. Reptiles and insects have a notoriously limited range when it comes to acting.

Also, this movie has a baby-faced-sans-mustache Sam Elliott in it, which is it's own fun.

master of the lip bonsai
And WHAT Sam Elliott has been married to Katharine Ross since 1984?! I had no idea...

 

Great White (1981) 

 

The Promise

look let's not haggle that's an amazing poster amirite

Let's be honest it would be tough for nearly any film to do this poster proud, especially back in 1981 - this is a GREAT poster. 

And this poster's promise is all about the fish. A Megalodon-sized fish. A crafty, stealthy son-of-a-fitch fish. A fish who gleefully, even wickedly grins as he prepares to snarf down his unsuspecting morsel, which morsel only wanted a nice tan and is that reason enough to be kilt off by a Wicked Megalodon Fitch? It is not. 

We mourn this morsel as we know corpses do not keep their tans long at all.

The Reality

(PPNF)

rubber duckie you're the one
you make bath time lots of fun
rubber duckie i'm awfully fond of you

A big, plastic, bobbing fish head, with two guys under the water, holding it upright so it doesn't just upend and float away. Okay, I have no idea if there are two guys underneath holding it in place, or even what it's made of, but that shark prop is shit. 

Movie's a fun watch, though, as long as you go into with the right attitude. (Hint: "I can't wait to see these amazing shark effects!" is not the right attitude.)

Onward to an invasion... of sorts.

 

Invasion of the Saucer-Men (1957)

 

The Promise

i don't know what to say except that i still long to see the movie this poster promises

This one is also a great poster. Maybe not as iconic a feeling as the one Great White has going for it, but still. And this poster just lays it all out for you, right? You will...

SEE teenagers vs. the (gigantic!) Saucer-men! 

SEE disembodied hand that crawls! 

SEE night the world nearly ended! 

SEE earth (or at the very least one of its larger cities) attacked by (three if not more) flying saucers!

The Reality

(PPNF)

come to hollywood they said
it'll be a thrill a minute they said

Okay, first things first: hard to imagine any of these fellows holding a full grown woman aloft in one hand. A little hard to imagine even if all three worked together using both hands.

And I know, it's a bit of a cheek to compare a behind the scenes photo to the excitement of that poster. But honestly, this photo is pretty indicative of the film as a whole.

As for world-ending, large cities and multiple saucers, it's been awhile but what I remember is a small backwoods town and just one saucer that I think the army blows up without meaning to. 

The crawling hand is totally delivered on, though.

But like some of the others, this is also a fun little film and, in spite of it's PPNF status, filled with charm and purposefully silly dialogue. Based on a short story that ends a bit more darkly than this movie does, as well. Just sayin'.

So, on to the next movie, lest we lose track of time and forget...

 

The Land That Time Forgot (1974)

 

The Promise

wait is that 2013's Poseidon Rex down in that corner, way back in 1974?

Well, I just love this film so you're not gonna see a lot of hate from me here. And I will say that pretty much everything we see on that poster, we also see in the film. Except the aquatic T-Rex/Allosaur.

The Reality

(PPF)

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Well. Loving the movie as well as feeling like it lives up to its poster promise clearly does not stop me from including this hilarious animated GIF. Way too good to pass up.

The GIF, in fact, makes the movie's effects out to be much worse than they are in reel life. The film's dinos were actually quite nicely realized (mostly as rod puppets) by a very talented fellow name of Roger Dicken.

And lest you wonder, by "very talented" I mean to say he also worked on movies like The Blood Beast Terror (1968), 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968), Witchfinder General (1968), When Dinosaurs Ruled the Earth (1970), Scars of Dracula (1970), Alien (1979), Warlords of the Deep (1978), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), White Dog (1982), and The Hunger (1983). 

Nuff said. On to the very last film: The... stinger... if you will.

 

The Wasp Woman (1959) 

 

The Promise

creepy

Well this is a pretty bizarre poster, I gotta say. Kind of a cinch it's not going to deliver due to that bizarreness on it's own. Seems like it's giving more of a "this is what the film will feel like" kind of vibe rather than straight up promising a giant wasp-woman.

But I would surely have paid a few bucks back in the day to see a giant-ass wasp with a woman's head and face, clutching some poor devil as she reels him in to his demise. (Quint would've said "...reels him in to his demeeeeeeeese." If his character were in this film, I mean.) 

Anyway, as far as promises go we have the giant wasp. We have "a beautiful woman." A "lusting queen wasp." Then we've got a wee struggling man and a pile of bones. 

Promises fulfilled?

The Reality

(PPNF)

i kill men after cleaning their pipes with my pipe cleaner antenna

No. While Susan Cabot gives a fine performance (finer than the film itself, I think) this one is shakes out as PPNF on the lack of giant wasp-ness alone.

I mean, as far as the "beautiful woman" promise goes, Cabot delivers. She was both beautiful and quite talented. The "lusting queen wasp" promise - I don't remember lust playing into the film at all, to be honest. Well, not sexual lust. Probably they were going for blood-lusting queen wasp, though. Which we do get. 

And the wee struggling man atop pile of bones... I'm gonna say no again. It's been (quite) a few years since I've watched this one all the way through, but I'm not remembering an any-sized pile of human remains in the film, let alone a big ol' pile like the poster promises. 

And, of course, since there was no giant wasp in the movie we could have no wee man struggling in its clutches.



 

And that's it, my friends. Our work here is done and the tally is:

PPF - 2

PPNF - 7

 

Until next time...

Saturday, May 27, 2017

Carnivores (1993) by Penelope Banka Kreps



THEY'RE BACK TO KILL!



Okay, I totally thought my next post would be something about King Kong, but here I am, talking about Carnivores instead. That happens sometimes. A lot, actually--thinking I'm going to be writing about one thing and then writing about some other thing, I mean. Don't worry, King Kong will have his day in court. I'm not sure what I mean by that. Oh. Sure I am. I mean the KK post is already in process and on the way, but this one seemed to want to jump in ahead, so I'm letting it.)

Wow. That was terribly, terribly rambl-y and digression-y. But that's the kind of thing that goes on in my head when I don't censor. Then again, if I did a better job censoring (here in these hallowed halls), my posts would all run about three sentences long. And where'd be the fun in that?

Anyway, no King Kong today, but we do have several prehistoric (mostly non-carnivorous) beasts, and they are BACK TO KILL! At least, so says the novel's front cover. Really, they're just back to breed and live out their lives in relative peace as far from human beings as possible. But peaceful living far away from humans does not sell books, does it, and so what we have here in this book is a clear-cut case of "Robin Brown's Megalodon Syndrome."

What's that? You say you've never even heard of that syndrome? Well, you can read about it here.

Yep. This is another one of those what-if-boringly-genuine-and-realistic-people-happened-to-run-across-boringly-genuine-and-realistic-prehistoric-animals stories that, in an attempt to gain more sales, IS MASQUERADING as a blood-and-guts-dinosaur-runs-amock story. Probably marketed as such with little or no input from its author, if my guess is right. So. I think I might've just said all I have to say about the book, right there in those previous two sentences.

Psssh, that's never true. I always find something to say, even if it ends up being only marginally related (and sometimes downright unrelated).

So. The first thing I noticed with this book was what looks to be a garden variety crocodile on the cover. (It's definitely not the prehistoric croc described in-story.) Naturally I figured it was a killer crocodile novel, which genre I'm not generally into, and I almost put it back down. But then a glance at the back cover told me it was not a killer croc on front, but (evidently) some kind of prehistoric killer croc. "Okay," I thought, " the prehistoric angle makes it worth a few hours of my time." And into the book bag it went.

So now, between the book's cover image and back cover blurb, I'm thinking: multiple prehistoric crocodilians running amuck in the everglades, due to some kind of earthquake thingie that lets them all out of the ancient underground cavern they've been living in all these eons. But then I read the inside front cover blurb (neither it or the back cover blurb were written by the author, as was apparent after I started reading the actual novel) and there's a vaguely described elephantine creature with a spiked tail lopping someone's head off. Doesn't sound at all like a crocodile to me, and now I'm confused. But I keep reading, 'cause at the very least, cover art and blurbs have set me up for some kind of prehistoric animal attack bloodbath.

But that isn't what I ended up getting. What I got was more or less a lower grade Jurassic Park (novel, not movie) clone, with fleshed out, reasonably intelligent characters encountering natural and realistically portrayed prehistoric animals. Not a lot of deaths to be had, and those that did occur were along the lines of "got too close to the nest and its protective momma" or "surprised and frightened the usually peaceful herbivore, which then attacked." Not much in this book in the way of "bone-crushing jaws and blood-dripping teeth" or beasts "hungry for the sweet taste of a new kind of prey called humans," as that back cover would have me believe.

So the plot of the book is basically that, due to some kind of fuzzy sci-fi novel science, regular everglade animals are giving birth to their de-evolutionized prehistoric ancestors, along with a couple subplots around modern folks who's minds (but not bodies) are reverting to a primitive state due to the same fuzzy science that has dinosaurs physically hatching from alligator's and bird's eggs, and a lost tribe who's been hanging out (undetected) in the everglades for thousands of years. The cause behind all these dinosaurs and caveman mentalities has nothing at all to do with earth tremors, or caverns, or any such thing. Near as I could tell, the cause was due to solar radiation and the ozone layer and recessive genes shared by both animals and humans. Along those lines, anyway.

Overall, this is a decently written story, that's awfully short on people running for their lives from hideously aggressive prehistoric mutants. So the brain count the book ends up with reflects it being decently written, with points lost for not being what it's marketed as. (Again! How many times will you do this to me, Paperback Novel Gods?!)

Anyway. The official brain count is:

TWO AND A HALF ALLIGATOR EGG BRAINS

Yeah. So I couldn't find a thing on the woman who wrote this story, other than that she wrote another book the year before for the same publisher. I'm reasonably sure the author really is named Penelope Kreps, due to that being an unusual name and my Google search bringing up someone with the name living/having lived in Florida where the novel takes place. But there's not much information to be had other than that she exists. I wonder if she published anything else, under other names. I'm always curious about these things.

Oh. In case you were wondering, the book at least mentions the following beasties as it goes along:

Mentioned and seen in passing....

I think one nonfatal encounter with these guys.

We see these a fair bit. They're probably as close to a main antagonist as it gets.

Seen in passing-- I wish there'd been even a little killer Dunk-action!

See these fellas a couple times. One kills a guy.

These are just mentioned (as cubs) in the epilogue's zinger.

Here's the other main-ish creature. One kill, I think, but mostly
we're watching scientists go all doe-eyed over captured babies.

And that's it. Hopefully something King Kong-esque next time. And I really want to get back to the Bionics in Miniature soon....

Friday, August 12, 2016

That's What He Said

I woke up this morning with a few of these quotes running through my head. (That happens to me.) Then I thought "what if I made these into a list and it was a quiz?" And just like that it went from being in my head to being real and on this page.

Here's the rules: You get, um, five points for every quote where you know what movie it's from (without looking anything up), and you get double points for every one where you know which character said it. Ooh, and triple points if you know the the name of the actor who played the character, on top of everything else (wow!).

Now this adds up to a lot of points, and you could potentially walk away from this whole thing very highly pointified, and since everybody loves points, I wish you the best of luck. But here's the bad news. Most of these quotes are obscure as hell and not easy to grock. The labels at the bottom of the post might (might) help you out some.

So here we go:

1. "Love to prove that, wouldn't ya? Get your name into the National Geographic."

2. "A naked American man stole my balloons."

3. "Some big, hard-boiled egg gets a look at a pretty face and bang, he cracks up and goes sappy!"

4. "Now I'm going in there to waste some teachers! Are you with me?!"

5. "I don't care if he killed a hundred people! We are scientists not moralists!"

6. "Oh, I wish we'd stuck to the road; these shoes just aren't made for hiking!"

7. "I'm only a head, and you're whatever you are. Together we're strong. More powerful than any of them."

8. "So, you have wounded me. But I must grow a new claw. Well and good, for I can do it in a DAY! But will you grow new lives when I have taken yours from YOU?!"

9. "Sir, I suddenly find your cognac as distasteful as your manner."

10. "Have you ever heard of insect politics? Neither have I. Insects... don't have politics."



(Well, well? How many'd you get?)

Tuesday, January 12, 2016

Megalodon (1981) by Robin Brown



THE MOST TERRIFYING FISH STORY SINCE JAWS
 


Nope. It isn't. Terrifying, I mean.

It's not really even about megalodons. There are three in the story, but the main reason they seem to exist is to act as foils for the book's actual main characters, two talking dolphins and a talking killer whale.

Now, before you get too upset, these dolphins and their killer whale friend aren't literally speaking English. They're communicating with the help of translation software their scientist-keepers have created: a dolphin chirps and clicks, it's run through a computer and comes out as computer-generated-voice English.

And that actually is kind of cool, it just doesn't belong in a deep sea thriller about giant sharks munching unsuspecting divers.

Hence my irritation with the book.

Technically that scene on the cover does happen in the novel, so it's not a completely false advertisement, but the scene is a long time coming, and it's less thrilling in-story than the cover might suggest. It's actually the only time in the book when human beings see a megalodon with their own eyes, react with gut-wrenching horror, and get munched.

I did a little research on Robin Brown, the novel's author. His previous book was nonfiction, The Lure of the Dolphin, and was billed as "a fascinating exploration into the bold discoveries linking man and dolphin--and the startling implications for the destiny of man, the sea, [and] the earth." Oddly enough, that's also a pretty fair description of this book.

What I'm getting is that the author was a big fan of dolphins so he wrote a couple of books, one fiction and one nonfiction, exploring how dolphins and mankind might work together in the future. I'm okay with that, I'm just not okay with this particular book being marketed as a monster fish story (which admittedly the author might have had little to do with) when it isn't.

Anyway. The megalodons themselves are bigger than current thinking generally allows for, with a 90 foot juvenile and a couple of 200 foot parents. They live (and spend the entire novel) at the bottom of a 15,000 foot ocean trench and are only seen by human beings, for the most part, as blips on a radar screen. They're written as relatively low energy bottom feeders, living off garbage cast from cruise ships and such, which a deep sea current conveniently carries down to them. They're also so covered in barnacles, mollusks and seaweed as to be indistinguishable from a rock formation when at rest.

So the author has taken these sharks and made them about as un-terrifying as he could. He's presented them as animals, part of the natural order, with as much realism as possible. I'm guessing if the animals described in this book surfaced next to your yacht while you were sunbathing on deck, you would initially be terrified at their sheer size, but assuming they didn't try to eat you or sink your boat (which they probably wouldn't), your terror would pretty quickly give way to awe.

And I think awe is probably exactly what the author was going for in his novel. It's just not the novel I wanted to read.

So again I'm pointing my irritation and disappointment at the book's marketers, whoever they might have been, because they sold me a (somewhat) interesting treatise on aquatic mammal and shark behavior disguised as "the most terrifying fish story since Jaws."

Other than that slight misrepresentation, the book is reasonably well written, if on the dry side. There are maybe a couple of minor editing issues (which the author also might have had little to do with). It seemed to me a character or two came into the story in a way that suggested they'd been introduced earlier, but hadn't been (as far as I could tell). A few characterizations were also a little uneven, with scientists talking at length about how dolphins and other sea mammals should be seen and treated as equals, then heading out to kidnap a sperm whale to help their research.

The most pulse-raising scene in the book is megalodon-free: after the juvenile meg swam past (but didn't attack) a deep diving nuclear sub, the resulting pressure wave caused serious damage, decompression, etc. The account of the sub's captain getting it stabilized and back to the surface is fairly high drama, and was actually more thrilling to read than any of the scenes with megs in them.

The overall plot of the book is this:

The US government is trying to do a mining survey at the bottom of this trench a few hundred miles out from Hawaii; they've realized the bottom of the trench is covered with gold and uranium. The first sub the Navy sends down gets mistaken for food by the juvenile meg, who gives it a quick bite, realizes it's not food and leaves. The sub goes back to the surface, damaged, and they send a diving bell down instead. It gets destroyed, again by the juvenile.

Meanwhile, the government has asked this research team to bring their dolphins out to act as spotters for the next sub and even think the dolphins might be able to survey the trench better than a sub can. But they can't dive deep enough, so the scientists capture a sperm whale and use the dolphins to convince it to do the deep water work. The second sub goes down and is damaged when the juvenile meg swims past it, etc. Anyway, the megs stay deep and the dolphins stay topside. The sperm whale has a brief tussle with the juvenile meg in the middle depths. No injuries to anyone involved.

There's also a Soviet sub lurking around, because the novel was written in the eighties and that was pretty much a requirement of the time. Eventually the juvenile gets torpedoed by the Russian sub and the parent megs eat it.

Near as I could tell, the book was published first in the US in 1981, hardcover then paperback (which is the cover I've got up above). It was also published in Great Britain as a hardcover (1982) and a paperback that was retitled as Shark! (1983). The covers of the other editions weren't nearly as cool as the American paperback, although the American hardcover, on the left, takes a distant second place.


And that's it, really.

TWO MEAGER MEGALODON BRAINS


Wednesday, November 24, 2010

King Kong Covered

I love pictures. And I love to compare things. And I love King Kong. Hence, we have:

A COMPARISON OF PICTURES OF KING KONG

Or, more precisely, magazine covers featuring King Kong. Most of these, by the way, come from Mike Scott's excellent site: Monster Magazines. I also grabbed a few covers from a Google image search. Anyway, Mr. Scott's site is well worth checking out.

We begin with, of course, the granddaddy of all monster magazines--Famous Monsters of Filmland.

FMOF No 6 - RKO's 1933 original and still the King--notice the wee magazine mascot hiding between Kong's teeth.

FMOF No 25 - note Mighty Joe Young peering out from that center bottom pic.

FMOF No 32 - the old Aurora model kit depicting one of the best scenes from the film.

FMOF No 44 - great scene from the 1933 film and - hello - an additional photo feature on Tarantula inside? Does it GET any better?

Ah yes. The legendary FMOF No 108. Possibly only legendary to me--it was a prized possession when I was a kid, lost then and reacquired now thanks to the miracle of eBay. Basil Gogos did the cover painting - w00t!

FMNo 125 - Most kids my age were being introduced to Kong through the 1976 remake of the RKO 1933 original. Not I. I'd been a fan of the original for half of my then 9 year lifetime.

FMOF No 132 - Another gorgeous cover painted by Basil Gogos.

FMOF was the first and I think the best of the movie monster mags, but there were a lot of others around for awhile. Check out a few of their covers.

The Monster Times was a newspaper format mag published between 1972 and 1976, and graced their very first cover with Kong. GRAAHHHGG!

A one-shot from 1976. Maybe in anticipation of the upcoming Kong remake....

A similar one-shot from 1977.

Monster Bash No 4 - a newer mag that is still publishing. Man, this wide-eyed gaping maw look was popular with the monster mag circuit....

Another one-shot - this one from the UK - 1977.

This mag was actually published by Marvel Comics. Featured Kong on their 1974 first issue. I don't know about the whole blood dripping jaws thing....

Um. Some Japanese magazine with Kong fighting Mechani-Kong. No idea on this one but it's pretty cool, huh?

What? This isn't a magazine cover. But it IS a monster size comparison chart that came up in my search and it's interesting. Sadly, Kong is that wee white silhouette fourth from the left, with only a T Rex, the Wicked Witch of the West and Chucky the killer doll smaller in size. I think if you click through, this is big enough to actually see and read stuff....

THE END